Jump to content

Talk:Sera Monastery/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well referenced, well-illustrated article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Thie is a well-reference and well-illustrated article that has a comprehensive scope. It's full compliant with the requirements of GA, so I'm awarding it GA-status. This article is some way towards being a WP:FAC, but as some of the references are "guide books", there may be questions over Reliable sources. However, I would suggest that this article is submitted to WP:PR. Congratulations on yet another GA. Pyrotec (talk) 10:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]