Jump to content

Talk:Sentence spacing/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Sentence spacing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sentence spacing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

2018 Study

The 2018 study that was in the lede was quoted incorrectly. As written, it was a conclusive statement about the readability of double sentence spacing attributed to the study's authors. However, the quote actually came from the secondary source that cited the study. And the author of that Forbes secondary source said it in jest, which is apparent when reading past the first paragraph in the article.[1] The title of the Forbes article (below) also contradicts the quote as stated in the lede.

Anyway, the study should be in the article, but seems more appropriate in the "studies" section. So I moved it there and clarified some of the details of the study. It also seems to be a bit like the 2002 Loh, Branch, Shewanown, and Ali which found slight evidence in the opposite direction, but not enough to be significant. I'd say this is a worthy contribution to the literature, but didn't conclude anything in the way it was stated in the lede.--Airborne84 (talk) 02:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Haelle, Tara. "One Or Two Spaces After A Period? That New Study Can't Tell You". Forbes. Retrieved 2018-08-23.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sentence_spacing/Archive_6&oldid=1124053876"