Talk:Sensitive compartmented information facility

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: British / European / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

We need a disambiguation

I just typed in SCIF to discover that we already had this term here. Just to point out, SCIF also stands for State Compensation Insurance Fund in California and Strategic Community Investment Fund on Prince Edward Island. We need a disambiguiation page here, though I'm not experienced in creating this. --Coolcaesar 23:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A great article about SCIFs was recently in the Washington Post. Portions should be incorporated into this Wikipedia entry: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/27/AR2006052701153.html?nav=rss_nation/special --Blakis 17:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SCIF Countries

This article (or whoever wrote it) is unfortunately guilty of American (Tunnel) Vision/AmericEarth. SCIF is not unique to the US, it's not a US specific term or facility. Australia, New Zealand, UK and probably many other English speaking countries ALL have SCIFs.

It would be good if this article could be edited to reflect that SCIF is a generic termed used by most english speaking western countries, and not a US specific/ONLY term; and remove it from the "US PORTAL" come on guys. Basic research would show this.

Australia: https://www.aigroup.com.au/globalassets/working_securely_with_defence_guide-1.pdf

NZ: https://www.gcsb.govt.nz/assets/GCSB-NZISM/NZISM-v2.7-December2017-Part-One.pdf

UK: https://www.scif.co.uk/ KarmaKangaroo (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image replacement

A non-biased image depicting a Skif should be used so as to not look as if trying to sway potential public opinion around skif's by using the current political climate around Mar-a-Lago as the only example imgae available. 2601:1C0:5501:3590:5431:203:828E:FAE3 (talk) 01:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile/Temp SCIFs

The article claims that there was a SCIF at Mara-Lago but several news organizations have said in reports that there was not. Are the sources credible? The CNN article uses Trump's press secretary as the source which possibly not be credible. 2601:152:980:9BA0:198:EF4D:8A1D:3127 (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]