Talk:Semiology (Gregorian chant)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Redirect now article
[edit]this lemma was redirected to >semiotics< until I started at least a beginning ...Martinuddin (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
External links issues
[edit]Hello, I patrol "External links" for compliance and found there are seven on this article. Three or four would be acceptable and possible five on a longer article with consensus. Would someone look at this for trimming the excess links? Thank you, Otr500 (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Article multiple issues
[edit]This 2008 article, having been tagged since 2008 as not citing any sources, has had no improvements. The article has a "Bibliography" section and seven "External links". I am going to tag and "Prod" this article because it is in bad shape, non-compliant with multiple policies and guidelines, and likely not notable. Otr500 (talk) 21:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
History section
[edit]As noted, this article has issues. While I disagree that notability is disputed, I think the lengthy section on the history of Gregorian chanting is unneeded and can be trimmed down to a link to the main article which, presumably, has all of the same info. Kazamzam (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)