Talk:Seletar Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Seletar Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060721021009/http://www.army.mod.uk/royalsignals/rsa/19sigregt/book_reviews.htm to http://www.army.mod.uk/royalsignals/rsa/19sigregt/book_reviews.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive sub sections and focus of controvesy

Hi SAaphIrEblUE, looking at the current state of the article, there are too many subsections for the section Instrument Landing System (ILS) Controversy With Malaysia. We should not use sub sections like a timeline as basically if I read off the table of content, it is a timeline of all incidents. It will be better off as proper prose and sub sections when there is a major event like the issue heading to International Arbitration court etc. The content listing looks too lopsided as of now. It may be better if a new article created on the controversy, with a link from here to that article. Thanks --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Xaiver0510, I concur with you. Per WP:BOLD, you have my full support to spin that entire controversial section into a separate article page. -- Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 06:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The section "Instrument Landing System (ILS) Controversy With Malaysia" is bloated with detail concerning an international spat of limited significance. I suggest the whole section be condensed into a short paragraph. Someone feeling the need to is welcome to transfer the existing content to a new article if they feel so moved. Regards Guffydrawers (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - The entire section should be shifted to a separate article, with the existing section replaced by a summarized paragraph instead. -- Hellox (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Seletar Airport, Singapore.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]