Talk:Sejong the Great-class destroyer

Military history: Maritime / Asian / Korean

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.

Archives

Archive 1

"Super Burke"

The words of "Super Burke" is not a generalized word. For example, when we search this word at Google and Yahoo, we can not find it. And Korean major newspapers don't use this word, too. They said "the King Sejong-class destroyers are reportedly the second most powerful after the American version. Digital Chosun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.217.70.191 (talk • contribs) 04:41, January 2, 2008

They are, however, clearly an enlarged version of the Arleigh Burke Flight IIA design. 71.203.209.0 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 06:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try searching for KDX "Super Burke" in Google. Anyway, the term "Super Burke" is not an official name or designation, but something that's been used by some USN personnel to describe the KDX-III's scale compared to the Arleigh Burke. enomosiki (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image links

Removed from ext links. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://bemil.chosun.com/brd/view.html?tb=BEMIL104&pn=1&num=1010 Photo images
http://bemil.chosun.com/brd/view.html?tb=BEMIL104&pn=1&num=1009 Photo images
http://bemil.chosun.com/brd/view.html?tb=BEMIL104&pn=1&num=1008 Photo images
http://bemil.chosun.com/brd/view.html?tb=BEMIL104&pn=1&num=1007 Photo images

Changed the title

Sejong the Great itself includes the word 'king'. Writing as King Sejong the Great contains two word of king. Kadrun (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sejong the Great-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527065207/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2009/ROK_09-22.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2009/ROK_09-22.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]