Talk:Seema Rao

Untitled

Intro Page Created Verifiable External Sources Added Edifix (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Removed tags after editing language and adding reliable sources. Edifix (talk) 04:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Both articles about the Rao couple read like advertisements

I cannot comment on the veracity of the various claims made in these two articles, but it's troubling that they seem to rely on many primary sources (subjects' own websites etc.) and overall the tone is such that they read like self-aggrandising advertisements. A neutral third party with no connection to the subjects or their work needs to edit both articles to reflect a more NPOV.

Needs to be reduced or removedBasicsOnly (talk) 06:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

This article, much like that of Deepak Rao is written as an advertisement and appears to be pretty much entirely based on primary sources, dead links, and unreliable narrators. I am proposing reducing this article to bare-bones levels just the same as what needed to happen on the Deepak Rao page for the exact same reason.

Many of the fabricated statements in the article are addressed in the below forum thread: https://www.bullshido.net/forums/forum/main-discussion-forums/ymas/4595579-bjj-mumbai-definitely-bullshido

Feel free to tag me if you agree, disagree, or want to discuss. I want to make sure this is done properly. Thank you.

Sure, a NPOV edit must be made but there are enough valid references here. It also looks like there’s a vested interest in taking this page down. Edifix (talk) 12:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

@Edifix: I have an interest in taking this page as well as the page on Deepak Rao down because simply put they are charlatans. In various news articles Seema Rao claims to be a Doctor, Lawyer, Commando Trainer, Miss India contestant, able to duck bullets at will, BJJ Black belt (disproven), Jeet Kune Do Black belt (highly suspect), 6th degree judo blackbelt (impossible), 8th degree "military martial arts blackbelt", a Japanese Jiu Jitsu Blackbelt, and many other claims. They also claim that their books are frequently used by the FBI, CIA, praised by the queen, etc. It's quite literally impossible. They are using this and other sources to create a borrowed reputation that they can live off of at the expense of their students and other people who believe their statements. For more information regarding some of the claims they have made, please see below. I also have other sources if you would like them.

https://www.bullshido.net/forums/forum/main-discussion-forums/ymas/4595579-bjj-mumbai-definitely-bullshido v/r BasicsOnly (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

And I didn't notice this before, but @Edifix: your entire edit history is composed ONLY of people related to Mr. Deepak Rao which I find highly suspect. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/edifix

Delete== I agree- Both articles about the Rao couple read like advertisements

I completely agree with the perception of advertisement as brought in light by others, and also suspect it as a promotional page and also this page fails in Notability in Multiple references.

==Misleading references== If you check every reference It looks like just a simple mention is there, The articles are either promotional or completely focusing on other person or husband of Mrs Rao. Also wanted to bring this in notice which I complexity agree with the other editor... As follows----

@Edifix: I have an interest in taking this page as well as the page on Deepak Rao down because simply put they are charlatans. In various news articles Seema Rao claims to be a Doctor, Lawyer, Commando Trainer, Miss India contestant, able to duck bullets at will, BJJ Black belt (disproven), Jeet Kune Do Black belt (highly suspect), 6th degree judo blackbelt (impossible), 8th degree "military martial arts blackbelt", a Japanese Jiu Jitsu Blackbelt, and many other claims. They also claim that their books are frequently used by the FBI, CIA, praised by the queen, etc. It's quite literally impossible. They are using this and other sources to create a borrowed reputation that they can live off of at the expense of their students and other people who believe their statements. For more information regarding some of the claims they have made, please see below. I also have other sources if you would like them.

https://www.bullshido.net/forums/forum/main-discussion-forums/ymas/4595579-bjj-mumbai-definitely-bullshido v/r BasicsOnly (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

The entire article seems to be misleading and fails the credibility of Notability. can be considered for "Deletion" =Delete== Regards

v/r DM (talk) 110;00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Dr seema rao.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles in attributing Look Promotional

I correspond with the other writers in the Favour of Deletion of this promotional sheet. I have no individual solicitude or Issue with this couple at all. I have high respect for their hard work as they claim (if proven by them on the ground). BUT, The wiki may not be the right platform to create a promotional profile, Article.

The Article miscarries Precedence (notable) and trustworthiness of most utmost of the links stated in the Testimonial segment. I completely agree with the point of view of Sir BasicsOnly and Sir Materialscientist . I am late to Wikipedia but an old soul on the planet of Internet and Internet Etiquettes (Protocols). I concur with my superiors and esteemed advisors (Sir User:BasicsOnly BasicsOnly and Sir User:Materialscientist ). They are senior guides who have designated points to a farthest professional manner. I do click with all genuine concerns and axiom of complete clean up of Promotional Profiles from Wikipedia. Another legitimate solicitude is one of the profiles who is bootlegging all links repeatedly to the answers and yielding the erudition as it is the same person. One of the Raos?. That is not an argument for me at a secluded level but of direction, would be at Professional Front for sure. Let's come in the unrestricted and have a fair consideration in regards to the Testimonials have been claimed in Articles. Let us have a legitimate prospect to comprehend this couple better with the official records. There are a lot of claims/Rumours about the unsaid unwanted charges on them? But as far as the Notability is provided and the Wiki policy is NOT misused and formed, I do not have an Issue, But for the next time. This time I correspond with the Seniours and propose to ==Delete==.

Must be Delete as maximum Articles in attributing Look Promotional, I agree with User:BasicsOnly

DeepaMourya (User talk:DeepaMourya) 19:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Dr seema rao.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)