Talk:See Here, Private Hargrove

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Film: War

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
	This article needs an appropriate infobox template.

Military history: War films / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

John Bushemi

There could be a cross reference to the John Bushemi article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/John_Bushemi

There is a reference to Hargrove in that article and Bushemi does appear in the book.

Minasbeede (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

5/29 edit

I just removed one of two citations of the same sentence by Elaine Woo. The first such citation is irrelevant or dubious, because the editor that put it there was using it as proof that the book was popular. Woo's actual quote was not about the book's popularity, it was about Lloyd Shearer's apparent "notoriety" (which is not sufficiently explained to make the later use of the sentence a relevant cite). Her use of the word "popular" in the sentence is not proof that the book was popular, because she was not writing about the book's popularity, nor was she presenting herself as knowledgeable about the book's success. An appropriate cite to support the book's popularity would cite numbers, awards, or would support the claim in a previous sentence that the book was at the top of the NYT Bestseller List. The final paragraph of the lead does not seem to be relevant to this article at all. It has to do with Shearer's unexplained "notoriety", which might be relevant to the article about Shearer, but is no more relevant to this article than would be an description of the weather on the day that Hargrove turned it over to his publisher. I also removed the sole external link which was about the film adaptation. There is already an article about that film, and the same ext. link is already there. It is not relevant to this article. 98.231.237.15 (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]