Talk:Security Battalions

Military history: Balkan / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Greece Start‑class Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

the oath

The section about the oath is false cause in the greek discussion page it was proved that this didnt exist and the article changed 85.74.154.101 (talk) 21:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no prove that the oath did not existed. There are citations claiming that Rallys ( the Quisling Prime Minister) refused - during talks with the German High Command to accept an oath to Adolf Hilter. But this is not a proof that it wasn't the oath finally like this.

Furthermore, the use of the SB as local units of the NAZI occupation forces at any time against the resistance proves the opposite.

Dkace (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i dont disagree that SB were nazi colaborators and trators,but there is also no prove that the oath existed or it was used...Also citations claiming that wasn't Rallis who refused to accept the oath but royalists and other officers who used to support Venizelos ... Pavlos1988 (talk) 09:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Oath (pov tag)

I have tagged this article as POV because of the lead.

Although not recognized by right-winged resources, there are various references pointing out that Security Battalion recruits were under the following oath:

I first object to the term "right-winged resources". This is a plain POV. I'm sure that the left in Greece has NEVER cooperated with a communist government (ha!)... but in any case, this POV about the current state of Greek politics has very little to do with the actions of Greek Collaborators almost 70 years ago. I'm therefore going to remove it without some very firm objections. Hitler was evil... but Wikipedia's mission is to talk about his actions... and the reader can decide. The same is true about the Security Battalions. V. Joe (talk) 04:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The wording "Following to uncertain references" isn't good English in any case. I suggest the following wording: "Members of the Security Battalions were required to swear an oath. The wording has not been confirmed. According to some left wing sources the German authorities wished recruits to swear the following oath...However Greek Prime Minister Rallis was opposed to....and wanted a different oath. Research has not yet established what oath was used, if any."

Fixed

Under the principle of WP:Bold, I have edited objectionable paragraph to read

Recruits to the Security battalion were under the following oath:

V. Joe (talk) 04:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More POV addressed

It is not known if this was finally taken into account or it was just a "political" flare of the puppet PM.

I have removed that paragraph and replaced it with "It is unknown whether Rallis' views were taken into account by German officiaals." Not great... but a vast improvement over loaded language of previous version. V. Joe (talk) 04:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC) "[reply]

POV tag replaced

I think that the entire article needs a substantial rewrite and don't have time to address it myself. Please consider rewriting it with an expert attention. As written the article reads as a lecture against collaboratism. (which I happen to agree with the articles POV)... However... the tone is rather too strident to be exactly neutral... and also uses very loaded language. Cheers V. Joe (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC) It is unknown whether Rallis' views were taken into account by German officials.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Security Battalions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614054908/http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=90180&start=0 to http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=90180&start=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]