Talk:Securing Energy for Europe

NPOV

I've removed parts of the "questions about activities" section from the article, as I'm concerned it's something of a coatrack - a series of negative or negative-sounding statements hung together without much editorial input. (I am also concerned about the reliability of some of the sources, but that's another issue)

Gornig's involvement with East Germany seems to be entirely unremarkable - he was a senior government bureaucrat, and is now a senior private bureaucrat. This fact is, however, being reported as through it was related to the allegations of fraud - but those don't seem to have anything to do with his past. The allegations may be worth mentioning (I am agnostic on this part) but they should be done so without a misleading context. Perhaps it would be worth mentioning Gornig's background earlier in the article (it is a relevant point) but bringing the fraud allegation up separately, so as not to imply a connection?

Strehober was investigated but not charged; the case was dropped. He was fined, but from my understanding of how the German system works, this seems to have been an administrative issue and not a "sentence" in the way we'd characterise it. Presenting it this way seems to unduly imply guilt, and the sources don't quite substantiate that.

Thoughts? Andrew Gray (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gazprom Germania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gazprom Germania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]