Talk:Section 508 Amendment to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does Wikipedia and MediaWiki in general comply to Section 508?
[edit]Does Wikipedia and MediaWiki in general comply to Section 508? I know we aren't a federal agency, but I am curious to know what accessibility is like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.197.183.78 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Image and Caption - perhaps not relevant?
[edit]The image can be interpreted as a promotion for the organization mentioned in the caption or its product(s), and does not appear to be particularly on-point for the topic. konetidy (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Section 508 Amendment to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130720042930/http://access-board.gov/sec508/preamble.htm to http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/preamble.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090823224139/http://www.access-board.gov:80/news/Access%20Currents/General.cfm to http://www.access-board.gov/news/Access%20Currents/General.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- C-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- WikiProject Accessibility articles