Talk:Second generation of video game consoles/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
This one has been sitting in the nominations list for a while, so I'll take a look at it. It's rather long so it might take me a little bit, but I'll promise to have it done in like the next day or two (maybe earlier). Namcokid47 (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
After looking at the article, I don't feel like it's up to snuff to pass as a GA at the moment. The writing seems good, as do the pictures, but the references need a lot of work before it can pass.
- Refs 1, 3, 4, 16, 20, 44, 45, 67, 68, 69, 74, 75, 88, 89 and 100 do not look reliable
- Removed and replaced with other sources Done CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Many of these are missing authors or dates. Ref 96 is a good example. -Warshaw, "Core Memory"- what is this? A book? A news article?
- I think I've filled in everything that I can. Done CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- All instances of "www.gamasutra.com" should be changed to Gamasutra, as that's their actual name
- Refs 79, 80, 82, 83 and 84 are all duplicates of each other, this needs to be fixed
- Ref 31 needs a date and author (if possible)
- Replaced with different ref Done CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Many of the refs are missing retrieval dates
- I was under the impression for sources such as books, magazines etc, you didn't need retrieval dates. It was more for websites? Could you clarify please? CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was referring to website. Sorry for not clarifying.
- I'd also personally archive all the links for the sake of thoroughness, but it's not required for a GA.
- Run the IABot on the page. Found a few dead links as well which have been fixed Done CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Once all of these are fixed, ping me and I'll take another look. Namcokid47 (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:Namcokid47 Need some clarification on point 5 but the above is done. CrimsonFox talk 13:31, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, I think this looks good. Promoting it now. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)