Talk:Sea Eagle (missile)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Comparable missiles

Quote of Dave1185 "we don't do comparison here on Wikipedia lest we risk becoming a bazaar for arms dealer to compare their goods :)"

I agree that wikipedia should NOT be a barter-place for haggling arms-manufacturers, however I do feel that linking to weapons of similar generations/capabilities does benefit the reader in search of information, especially the ones who is not an expert. /BP 78.70.77.35 (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive criticism: This article contains way too much information. No missile (many superior to this particular entry), contain as many words! Who cares about the minutia concerning the gestation of this particular missile? It is a very long and boring article. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.157.255.184 (talk) 23:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Eagle Missile Status

Ok - the Operators section lists nations and aircraft known to be capable to carry the missile. For the UK all aircraft listed are marked as retired aircraft.So what is the missile status with the UK MoD? Same Comment to Saudi Arabia. Users/ status of missile in previous sections fails to mention this. Is the UK or Saudi Arabia making integration efforts for missile to go onto newer Aircraft. Wfoj3 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]