Talk:SeaWorld Ohio

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SeaWorld Ohio article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Amusement Parks: SeaWorld Entertainment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by SeaWorld Entertainment task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Sources for timeline at end of park

The News-Herald newspaper can be used to source the facts from 2000 on, as its online archive goes back that far. I'll try soon to cull a few important relevant articles. Mapsax (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This should probably mention the closing dates (2000 was last season under Sea World management, and 2004 was the last season any of the animal attractions were open. 2005-2007 were operated solely as an amusement/water park.) I would edit it myself, but I don't have sources handy right now. Also, the Sea World side was opened as a water park in 2006, and operated concurrently with the old water park that summer, not post-closure of Geauga Lake proper. 207.58.228.18 (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SeaWorld Ohio Also Called SeaWorld Cleveland?

Was this SeaWorld also called SeaWorld Cleveland because I see both names on the article? --75.68.122.13 (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Jacob Chesley the Alternate Historian[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SeaWorld Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.seaworld.com/seaworld/sw_ohio/swoframe.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.seaworld.com/seaworld/sw_ohio/swoframe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs work

A couple of notable (imho) things are missing from this article. I can state for a fact that the profits from the park were a problem. The existence of a Sea World park in northern climate -where the park was closed for half the year - was economically unsustainable. The increasing criticism for the confinement and display of killer whales by the public was a problem, too. Both should be mentioned. It's not an accident that the Sea World Parks still open (as of 2023) are in FL, TX, and CA. (ya gotta support the animals 365 days a year, whether they're attracting crowds or not). Also, the info box lists the status as "defunct". What a strange way to put it! I don't know exactly what parts of the asset(s) were sold and which written off, my guess is most of the assets were sold. "Defunct" inadequately describes this. It might also be mentioned that Cedarfair really (and arguably intentionally) alienated its local customers by eliminating the local residential annual pass (Geauga Lake) and by withdrawing special pricing for certain children's programs. (If I recall correctly.) It was pretty obvious to me that Cedarfair's purchases were intended to eliminate the competition to Cedar Point. Whether the business could have been revived is moot, but unquestionably the tide was against both parks (Geauga Lake and Sea World) both because of the short season AND because of the economic decline of the Rust Belt. It certainly didn't help that both were restricted from certain (profitable) offerings by contract - a good example of a failure of strategic thinking, or perhaps short term greed over long term profits, IDK.174.130.71.156 (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]