Talk:Scythrophrys

	Scythrophrys is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

A fact from Scythrophrys appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Boie's frog (pictured) and the Banhado frog both resemble dead leaves on the floor of the forest?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scythrophrys.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

Boie's frog

... that the Banhado frog and Boie's frog (pictured) both resemble dead leaves on the floor of the forest?
- ALT1:... that the Banhado frog and Boie's frog (pictured) resemble dead leaves on the floor of the forest and both adopt a similar stiff, flattened posture when disturbed?

Reviewed: Jewish Legion
Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Heuglin's gazelle

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 08:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Approve ALT0, ALT1. Articles were each 5× expanded in seven days before nomination, are long enough, neutral, and cited to reliable sources. No copyvio or close paraphrasing detected. 2× QPQ verified. Image appears in Proceratophrys boiei article, has CC licence, and displays well despite the subject's camouflage (I raised the width to 160 for a horizontal image). In Scythrophrys, the hook fact is spread over three sentences with inline citation at the end, verified to source. Similarly with Proceratophrys boiei. Hooks are of good size (the larger being under 150 characters), formatted, neutral and interesting. Approve both. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]