Talk:Scyther

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles

Video games: Nintendo

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This redirect is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Anime and manga

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Orphaned references in Scyther

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Scyther's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gamesradar":

From List of Pokémon (202–251): Elston, Brett. "The complete Pokemon RBY pokedex, part 12". GamesRadar. Future Publishing. p. 3. Retrieved 2009-10-03.
From Lucario: Vassar, Darryl. "The complete Pokemon Diamond and Pearl pokedex, part 6". GamesRadar. Future Publishing. p. 7. Retrieved 2009-10-01.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scyther and Scizor

What about merge this article content along with this, and this content to (re)create a new article named Scyther and Scizor? There are other articles like this one I'm proposing such Pidgey, Pidgeotto, and Pidgeot, Koffing and Weezing, and Nosepass and Probopass, and the reception is generally direct to both Scyther and Scizor as could be seen in the history of Scyther and Scizor ([1]). I will only suggest to use this and this source that are used in nowhere. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles you mention are merged because they are notable as a pair, or as an evolution line. Their reception talks about them mostly as a group, not as individuals. Charizard is in a separate article from Charmander because its notability is as an individual, not as the last in an evolution line. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: those are articles are not merged, and I'm proposing it merger. What's your opinion about it? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the ones you linked to that are similar to what you are proposing. As for my opinion, I am not sure why exactly it was split back apart. I assume because not enough of the reception was shared, but looking at it, it doesn't seem to be that bad, and I wouldn't be opposed to them being one article. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll only wait for more commentaries. If no one oppose it, I'll merge them. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]