Talk:Scuttling

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scuttling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Shipwrecks High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

1812

Shouldn't the Baltimore harbor defense in the war of 1812 be included?

99.148.198.63 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Untitled

Should German aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin be mentioned here? Shawnc 03:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-The fate of the ship is not clear. That most of all concerns the Bismark

Merrimac

I think USS Merrimac (1898) should also be noted here as a significant act of scuttling. --B.d.mills 01:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a significant failure, I'd add the 1861 attempt. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 04:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dive, dive

I'd add 2 subs, if I could recall the names: 1 RN WW2, which nevertheless lead to her skipper's court-martial, & 1 USN, depth charged to destruction postwar, with her fate recorded by cameras placed aboard. Anybody? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 04:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know the RN sub that was scuttled, but a target ship purposefully destroyed in weapons tests doesn't seem like scuttling to me. I always picture scuttling to be under duress. Binksternet (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Torpedo or ?

I see an edit that specifies torpedoes as the usual agent of scuttling in naval warfare. What about opening a bunch of valves and hatches from within? Setting time-bomb explosives? Both of these methods have been used as well. Binksternet (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested restructure

In its current incarnation, the Scutting article, spends a lot more time/space talking about specific instances of scuttling instead of about scuttling. Instead of a laundry list of "notable historical" incidents, I'd like to suggest that the article be restructured around the different reasons to scuttle a ship (avoid capture, blockship, dive wreck, etc), with the individual incidents worked into the prose as examples. -- saberwyn 01:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USS Oriskany

In this article it is stated that it was scuttled with PCBs on board. In the article on USS Oriskany it states that the PCBs were removed. It would be helpful if someone who knows better would make both articles read the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.117.104.254 (talk) 02:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Booby trapped scuttled ships

The most dangerous problems for salvage were the Brenta which contained a booby trap sunk in one hold made of an armed naval mine sitting on three torpedo warheads and Regia Marina minelayer Ostia which had been sunk by the RAF with all mines still racked.

Please, someone with knowledge of this, include a mention of the resolution of this. I'm dying to know and the article just leaves us all hanging. Comet Tuttle (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I did not realize the article was so unclear. I'll try to make it more obvious.

The booby trap was disarmed very, very carefully and the Brenta was salvaged. The story with all its excitement, anger and drama can be read in US Navy Commander Ellsberg's book Under the Red Sea Sun, a highly recommended non-fiction account which reads like a thriller. (Find it in the nearest library by going here.) The minelayer Ostia, which could hold 80 mines, was salvaged by the Royal Navy's Lieutenant Peter Keeble with the help of US contractor Edison Brown, captain of the tugboat Intent, and his crew. I rather doubt that 80 mines were racked up in the minelayer, as there had recently been a stiffly fought effort to mine Massawa, and scores of mines were placed successfully by the Italians. This discussion forum includes a guy saying there were only "several" mines on the Ostia, and Keeble himself is reported to have disarmed them. Binksternet (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scuttled U-Boots

There are more than 200 scuttled U-Boots located mostly in the western Baltic and North Sea around Northern Germany and Denmark. The U-Boot scuttling has been omitted from the subject on Scuttling and would a very interesting almost contemporary subject to add. Some questions laying open: Why were the U-Boots scuttled? Why were the U-Boots not retained in a decommissioned state for posterity and examination? What U-Boots were scuttled? There is a detailed examination of U-Boots at UBoot.net. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurokanga (talk • contribs) 08:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most were scuttled in Operation Deadlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scuttling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113214657/http://www.milhist.dk/besattelsen/august29/safari_uk.htm to http://www.milhist.dk/besattelsen/august29/safari_uk.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stellar Banner - Could be added?

Stellar Banner scuttled after being declared unseaworthy

Stellar Banner could be added, I think, to a notable scuttling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.150.20.246 (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]