Talk:Scroll.in

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, May 11, 2017, see discussion.
delete, June 12, 2014, see discussion.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

See above history showing that articles on this news service have been deleted twice after deletion discussions. This version of the article has been created again. There is also a draft, which should either be deleted if this version of the article is deleted, or redirected to this article. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2018 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scroll.in and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scroll.in (2nd nomination). Robert McClenon (talk) 10:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of 'centre-left' in lead

@HapHaxion: Although not an avid reader of scroll.in, I am aware of its left leanings. However, abiding by Wikipedia's guidelines, or rather here say the policy, their seems to be a very genuine reason not to have any such additions without a proper source, especially in the lead. Per my verification of the sources mentioned in the lead, I did not find any mention of the publication referred to as center left. Any original search or making meaning by equating the sources (even if evident by common sense) will be against WP:SYNTH. Per my argument here, I am reverting your edits, and I hope any further argument would result in further discussion than direct revertion, exempting if I made any really silly mistake here. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 17:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]