Talk:Scrivener Dam

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Scrivener Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Canberra Low‑importance

	Australia portal Scrivener Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Which image where

It seems that we agree that Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg I added to the article, is the better image of the dam. Personally, I tend to add this to the infobox. -- User:Docu 10:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

No one has agreed? Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg is over exposed (and something photoshop will not fix), only partly shows the dam wall were as File:Scrivener Dam.jpg shows the whole dam wall with the lake in view and also fits nicely in the infobox. Bidgee (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I must have misread your edit summary. The advantage of Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg is that it shows more of the dam than File:Scrivener Dam.jpg. The quality of the first image is debatable, but the dam section on File:Scrivener Dam.jpg is in the shade. In addition, File:Scrivener Dam.jpg is already used in other articles. Ideally we would have a version of File:Scrivener Dam.jpg taken from a further distance. (Full disclosure: neither was taken by me). -- User:Docu

I disagree. The Dam is longer then what Image:Scrivener Dam Canberra-01JAC.jpg shows only a small part of the dam. It's not possible to get a photo unless you go into the river as the Zoo and trees prevent a better view from the west (were this was taken) and to the east there is a fence (which can bee seen in the panorama.) but could be possible to access further down. I've lightened the panorama up. Bidgee (talk) 11:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]