Talk:Scream (Kelis song)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Substantive review to be posted within a day or so. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Many other critics stated how the song's composition could be split into different sections, ungrammatical

"Scream" is an up-tempo, synthpop,[1] electro-dance[2] and techno[3] song with elements of house[4] and soft-rock.[3] So, are you trying to say that it is a mish-mash of several music genres?

The song received generally mixed to positive reviews. What is that supposed to mean?

Sarah Bee of BBC Music agreed compared the song to works by Dutch house DJ Fedde Le Grand, ungrammatical

"Scream" was recorded at 'Casa de Kelis' and mixed at 'Gum Prod Studio' in Paris. Incorrect use of quotes, what is 'Casa de Kelis' supposed to mean?

This fails the reasonably well written criterion. Should never have been nominated without a thorough copy-edit.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Shopping sites such as 7digital and amazon are not reliable sources. Please see many archived discussions at WP:RSN
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Details of production of the song are needed. Trivia such as the nipple incident are irrelevant.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
ON hold for a thorough copy-edit, reference improvements, and broader coverage. Seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it has been a week and no response has been made, or any edits made to the article, even though the nominator has been editing throughout the period. A note was left on the nominator's talk page seven days ago, so I shall not be listing at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]