Talk:Scott M. Gimple

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scott M. Gimple article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Name

It appears that his actual middle name is the rather boring "Michael" and not "Milhouse" as the article suggests. The "Milhouse" appears to have been a joke made by his fellow Walking Dead producers at a convention, and taken seriously by fans. Both IMDB and mylife.com state his correct middle name as Michael. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lib2003 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beard

Hi! Just to let people know, he has a beard now, has had for a while, on every Talking Dead appearance for the last few years. If anyone sees Scott at Comic-Con or somewhere we need a recent picture of him with his beard. Thank you!--2A02:C7D:892B:3D00:A1F0:D634:9A5B:7FBF (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

If Gimple's work annoyed some of the fans of one of the series that he worked on, perhaps someone could find some independent reliable sources that mention this? Then it could be included in the article, subject to due weight and any other concerns. MPS1992 (talk) 08:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Absolutely. It deserves to be on here. He has greatly angered two fandoms and tanked the ratings on two shows and I can't really even find a single person defending his choices. I added some but feel free to vet it some. BlazingOwnager (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- That whole section reads like a rant. As others have pointed out in their attempts to remove it, it is very one-sided. That whole piece could be summed up in the same paragraph in "Career" that mentions his work on The Walking Dead.Pjor1 (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World beyond walking dead

Well after a decade of absolutely loveing walking dead and then giving us world beyond not so much fear of the dead just cudent get in to it you have to go and ruin it ,in the last few minutes by braking one of the cardenal rules I just can't believe you cud of gon along with it running zombie what the f### George A Romero would be turning in his grave and I'm assuming he was a big influence with by far the best zombie films ever made Dawn and day of the dead I am so disappointed actually gutted because I have one rule and I bet any die hard zombie fan has zombies do not run,I have a very large zombie dvd collection and I can tell you now not one of my dvds will have a running zombie in it ,please please don't go down this road you will destroy the franchise wich up to now has been epic over and out 2A02:C7E:C8A:EF00:D434:3E64:C71A:2D08 (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]