Talk:Scott Jennings

NPOV and BLP Standards

This article reads like a series of press releases promoting the career of a political consultant, rather than meeting Wikipedia's biography standards. For example, statements & headers like "Jennings Named Resident Fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics", and the following text, as well as "Jennings Joins CNN".

Bothered that NYC Roosevelt statue removal

Goes on CNN and expressed disdain for people voice, via votes. Wikipietime (talk) 11:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Censorship on Wikipedia

Marquardtika haa been editing Wikipedia for at least nine years, has made almost 60,000 almost entirely political edits, and somehow doesn't seem to know that Wikipedia emphatically does not censor content. I saw Amber Rose for the first time at the RNC convention last week. She's extremely articulate, but her Trump endorsement pitch was silly. I presumed she is an entertainer. I'd never heard of her before, so I looked her up. I didn't know anything about her, but soon I saw and heard other quotes from Jennings regarding her. Jennings is a right wing commentator and political operative who regularly talks about how awful democrats or liberals or progressives are and derides them, and he went on about how terrific Rose was. I quickly found out she was a Porn star who has appeared on "OnlyFans," an adult content website which I'd never heard of before this year. I didn't make that characterization up. Editors can Google her name and "porn star" and start counting the hits. I'm not coming to any judgment about her. What she does is her own business. But editors should not engage in scrubbing her WP article. Similarly, Marquardtika also has been around long enough to know that we are not allowed to plagiarize other editors' edits, but he used the citation I'd created for his substitution of narrative content. He's also failed to notify me that he'd reverted my edit. I hope he doesn't repeat this behavior. Activist (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

As I stated on my talk page, you really need to familiarize yourself with WP:BLP. You added to the article that Amber Rose is a "former porn star" but the source you provided doesn't say that. Our article on her doesn't say that. I Googled "Amber Rose porn star" and camp up with this Daily Beast article saying that "Republicans have midentified Rose as a porn star." She's not a porn star, current or former, and we can't add things to articles that aren't in sources. It's quite simple. Marquardtika (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Please link to Jennings election explanation

Jennings was a member of the Election night panel on CNN. He gave a widely reported explanation of Trump won, but his speech quickly became hard to find. Please include a link to it in this article.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-s-victory-is-the-revenge-of-the-working-class-american-says-cnn-s-scott-jennings/ar-AA1tCbH7

Janice Vian, Ph.D. (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

US Attorney firing lacks context and contains biased elements

The following is a bald assertion without evidence or citation, suggesting authorship by either the subject or an ally. It is also factually challenged since the controversy was not about the firing being constitutional, it was about the political motives of the firing.

The “controversy” into firing U.S. Attorneys was not really a controversy because the Constitution does not limit the President’s power to dismiss executive branch appointees at will, including U.S. Attorneys. It was pure political theater. 2601:207:81:9C80:75BD:8BA6:484A:33E8 (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)