Talk:Scott Griffith

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool based on the length of the article. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Griffith

The subject of this entry runs a small private company. There is no indication that this person has met Wikipedia standards for notability. For example, there is no indication that he has received a well-known and significant award or honor or has been nominated for one several times. There no indication that the person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field. Hence, the subject does not meet a single criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thus, this entry is nominated for deletion due to lack of notability. TippTopp 02:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Please see the following on Google News to assert his Notability;

Google News - 1

Google News - 2

Google News - 3

There are a few articles above not about the subject we are concerned, but most of others. Are the above articles not enough to cover his Notability? If so why? Which Wikipedia Policy says exactly how much "Google News" hits a Subject needs to assert his Notability? EconomicTiger (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, the point of a maintenance template is to help improve the entry, removing it without changes, as you've done, helps no one. There may be a basis for notability, but posting Google searches isn't going to get us there; see WP:GHITS for starters. I haven't had the chance to sort through the searches you've posted, but note that mentions of Griffith in articles primarily about Zipcar do little to establish notability for him. That's why the sheer number of Google hits counts for little. Hairhorn (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]