Talk:Scott's Hut

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scott's Hut article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica: Ross Dependency High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Ross Dependency work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Research stations in Antarctica#List of research stations|List of Antarctic research stations]] The anchor (#List of research stations) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

Ok, very quickly. This article is sort of worthwhile - it's a tangible 'historic site', even getting a few tourists. As such we need to clarify its location. The article as it stands suggests that the hut was built during Scott's first expedition. Need to pin down when it was actually built. Also note that Scott, Bowers and Wilson are not buried on monument hill, although the remaining members of the 1910-1912 expedition raised a cross there as a memorial. Observer magazine (as I recollect) did a story with lots of photo's back in the early 70's. I've embarked on an Antarctic journey of sorts, via Aspley Cherry-Garrard, and will get back to this in due course.Tban 15:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have managed to sort out most of the confusion between Scott's Hut and the Discovery Hut. It remains to put in a section describing each hut, and their construction methods. Then another section should go in regarding efforts to preserve the huts, and a reference to how they are being used to study the (very slow) effects of mold and fungi in the Antarctic. Then - back in the history 'groove' need to make reference to how the Discovery Hut was used by Shackleton in 1907(?), and a side-reference to Shackletons hut at Cape Royd. And a sketch map might help.. And a short note about who first visited Scott's Hut at Cape Evans post-1913. Likely to be the US Navy (same time as the Discovery Hut was opened) but it would be nice to have confirmation.Tban 10:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dicovery Hut v. Scott's Hut

Discovery Hut v. Scott's Hut, the same photo is use in both articles, claiming it is both Discovery Hut and Scott's Hut. Either one is incorrect or the entities are identical, which is it?

Scott's Hut and Discovery Hut

From what I can see, these are two names for the same hut. I can't believe it's worth two articles, so I'm suggesting we merge into one, and I'm suggesting Scott's Hut by default because it's been on Wikipedia longer. Any thoughts or comments are welcome. -- WORM MЯOW 14:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I take that back, upon further reading, they do appear to be seperate huts. -- WORM MЯOW 14:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rancidity != bacteria

Just a small observation, but the seal meat becoming rancid probably does not indicate the activity of bacteria. True rancidification can be a purely chemical process, and only requires exposure of fats and oils to either water or oxygen. Naturally the process slows down at low temperatures, but -- unlike bacterial attack -- it does not completely stop at any temperature.

It might also be interesting to discover if the reports of fungal attack on the timber are based on microbiological analysis, or simply on the physical condition of the timber. There are quite a few purely physical processes attacking these timbers, such as frost weathering. -- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Scott's Hut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]