Talk:Scotch'n'Soda Theatre
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment
[edit]In 2000, the Public Relations Coordinator on the board did a revamp of PR. In the end, he tried to make sure how Scotch'n'Soda's name was presented was consistent. It still isn't very consistent to this day, but having the wikipedia entry recognize it how Scotch'n'Soda recognizes itself would be nice. My point is, that it should be referred to as Scotch'n'Soda or S'n'S with no spaces in between the apostraphe. Here is the primary source: [1]. I don't want to change it, because I am the current PR Coordinator, and I think it's bad taste for me to change the article. Yincrash 06:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
also, it's Public Relations Coordinator, not Designer. Otherwise, good work on this article. Yincrash 06:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm going to edit a few typos and a goodly number of run-on sentences that appear throughout this article. There are also a few sentences that I think could do with better phrasing. I'll edit them and if other's who know the organization know better, they can revert them. Anyone know why this is categorized as an Athletic Organization at the bottom? That seems odd to me. Scoot 15:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]Per the AFD result, I hereby propose that the verifiable and cited materials in this article be merged into Carnegie Mellon University#Student life.--GrapedApe (talk) 03:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Merged.--GrapedApe (talk) 01:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- The AFD result was 'keep', not 'merge'. I know there was no counter in the week since your proposal, but the AFD result wasn't merge. I propose reverting this merger. MalignantMouse (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, the AFD result was 'keep.' Such a merge is really not in line with the AFD, especially due to the large amount of information that this article contained. SeanMD80talk | contribs 23:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- The AFD result was 'keep', not 'merge'. I know there was no counter in the week since your proposal, but the AFD result wasn't merge. I propose reverting this merger. MalignantMouse (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Editing in bad faith
[edit]Deleting this page this way shows extraordinariIy bad faith, completely gaming the system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.174.93.47 (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)