Talk:Scooby-Doo Mystery

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability

I throughly disagree with the poster who says that the game is 13 years and not well know. This is besides the point. Evidence has to be provided that the game exists and evidence that it exists. Games are not listed based on notoriety. Dwanyewest (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOYS notoriety established Dwanyewest (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. If that is the standard for video games, so be it. Happy WPing. :-) -Northwestgnome (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunsoft

Originally Sunsoft was to publish the titles themselves, but they were in some straits during the mid-1990s (some which I guess you can attribute to the infamous Aero the Acrobat) so eventually megapublisher Acclaim released it for them. Haven't seen a readily available source that mentions this; although Sunsoft was listed as the originally publisher in magazine articles back in the day. --Jtalledo (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros.

I believe whoever added Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment is basing that on a present day assumption, instead of who was in charge back then. Even in 1995, I don't think they were involved. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...Nevermind. Name is on the box! Sorry! -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 10:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They're on the front cover of the SNES version, but not the Genesis. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 10:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]