Science in the Age of Enlightenment is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2016.Art+FeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArt+Feminism articles
If anyone would like to tackle biology, botany, medicine, mathematics, geology, etc., these are some recommended general references that I used:
General introductions:
Burns, William E. 2003. Science in the Enlightenment. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
--Has information on all relevant disciplines, the major players of each, and contains bibliographical references for further reading.
McClellan, James Edward and Harold Dorn (2006). Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction. JHU Press.
--Standard 'Introduction to the History of Science' textbook. Good place to start. It's cheap too.
Porter, Roy, ed. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
--Heavier text than the other two, but also contains a lot more information. Volume four is specifically about 18th c. science. I would recommend this text over McClellan and Dorn, but it's a good companion to Burns.
If anyone requires additional sources for a specific discipline, feel free to ask. It would be nice to see this article become either a good or featured article. Poor 18th c. science gets no love.
Carpe Carpio (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
