Talk:Schizogeny

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schizogeny article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Schizogeny has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Schizogeny is part of the The X-Files (season 5) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Schizogeny/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 04:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 04:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

You repeat who wrote the episode in the lead, so it might need some rewording
First sentence of plot has a lot of commas, which are kind of distracting
You jump from Bobby being terrified to Scully hypothesizing. When did she arrive there? It seems kind of abrupt.
"Ramirez tells Mulder that Karin Matthews' father's death" Removed bolded
""Schizogeny" was written by first-year staff writers Jessica Scott and Mike Wollaeger, who had previously worked on The X-Files in non-writing jobs, and eventually became known as "The Killer Tree Episode" amongst the cast and crew" Split into two sentences
Who called the writing process "abnormal"?
"editors feared that his mumbly voice" Who's voice?
"would not be uncomfortable during the sinking scenes" -> would be comfortable? (trying to avoid double negatives)
"The shot that called for Karin Matthew's" Isn't her name Karin Matthews? So it would be Karin Matthews' ... Same for another sentence in that paragraph
"An addition tree limb" additional
Specify you mean Canadian government
Be consistent with ratings in lead and reception section (21.37 vs 21.3 - technically similar I know but still an issue)
Why did VanDerWerff think it might have been one of the series' worst?
As in the past, be consistent with date formatting

Thanks for sprucing up the article! I'll place this review on hold for seven days while the above comments get addressed. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton for reviewing this. I believe I've addressed all the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good! Passing for GA. Ruby 2010/2013 17:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Lindala

Most episode articles refer to Toby Lindala as males but this one says "her art department". Mr Larrington (talk) 03:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]