Talk:Schijndel
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
With so little information this data is best put to used in an economy section for Schijndel gidonb (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose on the grounds that a 150-year old company of that size will be independently notable. Klbrain (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. While the above is an irrelevant notability argument, I have expanded the article and it can now be kept! gidonb (talk) 19:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)