Talk:Scene.org

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Award winner list?

Would it be a good idea to have all winners and nominees in this article or a separate one just like the Razzie/Oscar things? // Gargaj 18:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Separate one. --Vossanova 19:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The emphasis was on the "would it be a good idea?" :) // Gargaj 03:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capital letter

Is it scene.org or Scene.org? // Gargaj 03:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scene.org? They capitalize it at the start of sentences, but not in the middle of one. I take that to mean that it's not strictly lowercase, and thus should default to a mixed-case article name like any other. --Vossanova 14:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sceneorg.png

Image:Sceneorg.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Scene.org Awards

Not sure if Scene.org Awards merits a standalone article. It is currently based in primary sources. A single article would meet WP:GNG easier. Λeternus ^(talk) 09:49, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be sceptical if this merge would be wise, as I assume that after the merge the information about the scene.org award will then be challenged by "not backed by a second source" and deleted. --Lambdacore (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Video requested

This documentation could benefit from a screencast to explain the topic in an easily accessible way. See WikiProject Screencast for additional information.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scene.org. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090710043428/http://www.scene.org/sponsors.php to http://www.scene.org/sponsors.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]