Jump to content

Talk:Scarlet myzomela

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleScarlet myzomela is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 3, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2017Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 8, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the nest of the Scarlet Honeyeater (pictured) is a tiny cup of shredded bark bound with spiders' webs?
Current status: Featured article

what they eat

[edit]

the scarlet honey eater will eat animal droppings as well as there own if there is a scarce food supply —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aznp2pro4u (talkcontribs) 07:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

bookmarks

[edit]

http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/38791995 this] for history Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Scarlet myzomela/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) 11:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having a go at it! Would make straight forward changes, and feel free to revert any of my edits in case of any mistake.

your changes look ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "At 9 to 11 cm (3.5–4.3 in) long" this could use the conversion template.
added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There should be something about taxonomy in the lead, for example about John Latham describing it.
added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • " ...synonymy. though the name Myzomela dibapha was occasionally used. particularly" There are just two extra fullstops punched in.
not sure how that happened. comma-fied now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link John Gould and Richard Schodde.
link added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • New Caledonia should be linked too.
link added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • " ...The Wakolo myzomela, Sulawesi myzomela, Banda myzomela and New Caledonian myzomela were" per MOS:OXFORD, the comma list should be consistent. Later in the section, " ...to the Pardalotidae (pardalotes), Acanthizidae (Australian warblers, scrubwrens, thornbills, etc.), and the Maluridae (Australian fairy-wrens) in a " has a different comma list style.
I don't like Oxford commas but they are very very useful for slotting references behind if needed...so added one Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, we should have consistency. There are a few places like "Insects eaten include beetles, flies, bugs and caterpillars" where there is no comma before the and. So, would you prefer the Oxford commas or the other ones? I could change them according to the comma style you prefer. Adityavagarwal (talk) 16:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adityavagarwal (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

better to add commas for ease of reference-slotting Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would be completing it by today, most probably (just have to study a bit more for tomorrow's exam).

  • Link Queensland, (Gippsland, Victoria), New South Wales, omnivorous, and Syncarpia glomulifera.
links added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "... in early Spring (August) and" I think that the month of August falls in Summer (or Autumn), but not early Spring.
August is winter/early spring in the Southern Hemisphere (where I am, as well as the scarlet myzomela) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, din't know that. Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link fledged, wingspan, covert feathers, and incubate.
links added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It has relatively long wings for its size; when the wing is folded..." I think it should be "It has relatively long wings for its size; when the wings are folded..." instead.
done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giving one more read now...

  • Ref 25 does not have anything about scarlet myzomela (was archiving the web-urls, so I came across the issue).
you have to enter the name in the search box and it will show the data on the relevant species Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Point number 3 is to be fixed.
done now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, I have commented on point number 6.
advised now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The rest is superb! Adityavagarwal (talk) 11:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    Extremely stable.
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Awesome article! Just few nit-picks there. It is a pass. Adityavagarwal (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Scarlet myzomela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:Myzomela sanguinolenta 1 - Windsor Downs Nature Reserve.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 10, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-03-10. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlet myzomela

The scarlet myzomela (Myzomela sanguinolenta) is a small bird of the honeyeater family Meliphagidae. At about 10 cm (4 in) long, it is the smallest honeyeater in Australia. It has a short tail and relatively long down-curved bill; the male is a striking bright red with black wings, while the female is entirely brown. The bird is more vocal than most honeyeaters, and a variety of calls have been recorded, including a bell-like tinkling. This male scarlet myzomela was photographed in Windsor Downs Nature Reserve, New South Wales.

Photograph credit: John Harrison