Talk:Scandia (theme parks)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
COI edit request
[edit]An impartial editor has reviewed the proposed edit(s) and asked the editor with a conflict of interest to go ahead and make the suggested changes. |
The current published version of the article doesn't make it clear why the brand is run by different companies because its history isn't in the article. I used to work for one of the locations, which makes it so I'm limited by what WP:COI recommends me do. I would like the below transcluded draft version of the article to be added to the article.
[Transcluded page removed]
--Wkln (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am removing the transclusion of your userspace page. Such a transclusion is inappropriate for a number of reasons, perhaps the most important being that it leads to this talk page being listed in unsuitable categories. Here instead is a link to the userspace page: User:Wkln/Scandia (theme parks). JBW (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- To add to JBW's statement and to go specific for clarity, that transclusion alerted the Category:Draft topics used in wrong namespace and Category:AfC topic used in wrong namespace categories (which irrelevantly I've been tracking since October 2023).
- Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. With two notes: Don't add the "Locations" sections, readers can find that in the rest of the text, and please move the reference tags into the body of the article, instead of defining them in the References section and then using that in the body. Rusalkii (talk) 05:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)