Talk:Sawyer's

A fact from Sawyer's appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 June 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sawyer's, known for making the View-Master, was at one time the second-largest U.S. manufacturer of slide projectors?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sawyer's.

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Question about "Sawyers" as credit on photos

Does anyone know whether western Oregon photos such as the one shown here, with the credit "Sawyers" at lower left, would have any relation to this company? Or is it just a coincidence of name? - Jmabel | Talk 03:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as the primary author of the Sawyer's article, I don't know the answer to that question and don't have time right now to do any research. However, it seems likely to me that it's the same company, because, as mentioned in the article, then-Portland-based Sawyer's was a photo-finishing company and producer of scenic Oregon postcards for many years. However, I don't believe the appearance of the name in the image indicates that Sawyer's was the author, as is currently stated on the Commons file page. We don't have enough info., but it seems possible that they just had a contract with a state agency to produce prints like this one that included granting them the right to credit themselves in each image, even though (under this hypothetical scenario) they were only the processer and/or printer, and the photographer was a state employer. But I don't know. SJ Morg (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was posted to Flickr by USFS, who were certainly not the author of the many postcards they were uploading. I agree that Saywers is more likely as a publisher than as an actual photographer (ditto for most of the other credits I've been able to add), but crediting USFS as "author" seems even more wrong (and had led to a bunch of dubious licensing claims, which we now need to sort out). - Jmabel | Talk 06:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]