Talk:Save Room (song)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Saveroomcover.jpg
[edit]Image:Saveroomcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
the video
[edit]I've just this information regarding the video: "In a interview John said the concept of the video was that his girl keeps changing personalities on him that's why there are so many different women.Each woman represents a different personality. It wasn't that he was sleeping with different women. If you notice the woman at the end is the same woman in his bed in the beginning of video. He's trying to convince her to stop changing. He wants her to stay, but she keeps changing. Listen closely to his lyrics!" Maybe someone could include that into the article, which is misleading at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.64.176 (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)