Jump to content

Talk:Saturdays of Thunder/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

After reading the article, I concluded that,

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This might be a fast review, but the article only took me 30 minutes from start to finish. I found no major problems in the article, so I conclude this review as passed. :) —Terrence and Phillip 07:57, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look. Theleftorium 08:55, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]