Talk:Sarsen

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

·--216.109.0.5 (talk) 13:42, 24 September 2010 (UTC)A very light-weight page. Strange to use a picture of a megalithic monument in an article concerning the lithotype itself. I'll have to see what I got last week at Avebury ... nothing close-up of the stones themselves, unfortunately. Something I'll have to remember next time I'm down there.[reply]
Searching Jnl.Geol.Soc.Lond, I come up with the following sarsen-related papers :
E. C. Spicer "Sarsen-Stones in a Claypit" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v61: pp39-42.
George Maw "On the Occurrence of Consolidated Blocks in the Drift of Suffolk" Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society v23: pp110-114.
I'll see what I can do to update the article.
Aidan Karley (talk) 09:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC) the sarsen stones are 6 centimeters squared and 21ft tall→[reply]

To add to article

To add to this article: an explanation of why "Saracen stone" was used to refer to stone indigenous to the British Isles. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]