Talk:Sareqaum

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Accessible to a general audience

@UserNumber: A few months ago, DoubleGrazing removed the "History" section heading with the edit summary, "deleted pointless section header (covered virtually the entire article)", and added the {{sections}} cleanup template. Since then, your only action on the issue has been to restore the history section heading.

Can you get any ideas for sections from studying Wikipedia's best articles about families (Family of Gediminas and House of Plantagenet)? The article can't support many sections or subsections at present because it's short, so {{sections}} may not be the most apropos tag, but I agree with DoubleGrazing's broader point that the article could be made more accessible to most readers.

Could you make it easier for readers without background knowledge of Sylhet to understand, for example by explaining terminology and concepts, by expanding, or by rewording? Writing good captions is an art. Can you improve the picture's caption to make its relevance to the family clear, and to draw the reader into the article? The quote box will leave the vast majority of readers of the English-language Wikipedia nonplussed. What should readers who don't speak Bengali make of it? Neither the poet nor the poem appear to be notable. Has anything been written in reliable sources about the poem?

Finally, the lead is okay as far as it goes, but does it adequately summarize the key points of the contents? --Worldbruce (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, @Worldbruce:. I'll see what I can do. UserNumber (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]