Talk:Sareqaum
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accessible to a general audience
[edit]@UserNumber: A few months ago, DoubleGrazing removed the "History" section heading with the edit summary, "deleted pointless section header (covered virtually the entire article)", and added the {{sections}} cleanup template. Since then, your only action on the issue has been to restore the history section heading.
Can you get any ideas for sections from studying Wikipedia's best articles about families (Family of Gediminas and House of Plantagenet)? The article can't support many sections or subsections at present because it's short, so {{sections}} may not be the most apropos tag, but I agree with DoubleGrazing's broader point that the article could be made more accessible to most readers.
Could you make it easier for readers without background knowledge of Sylhet to understand, for example by explaining terminology and concepts, by expanding, or by rewording? Writing good captions is an art. Can you improve the picture's caption to make its relevance to the family clear, and to draw the reader into the article? The quote box will leave the vast majority of readers of the English-language Wikipedia nonplussed. What should readers who don't speak Bengali make of it? Neither the poet nor the poem appear to be notable. Has anything been written in reliable sources about the poem?
Finally, the lead is okay as far as it goes, but does it adequately summarize the key points of the contents? --Worldbruce (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback, @Worldbruce:. I'll see what I can do. UserNumber (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)