Talk:Sardar Sarovar Dam
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]This whole article needs to be rewritten to make it NPOV. I am goin to add POV check here Bharatveer
who will talk about the cost increased due to narmada bachao andolan. One should make thread regarding the project cost increased in nintes due ti court cases and medha patkat association.
Figures provied here are really need to check. May be this is only provided by naramda bachao andolan and medha patkar ,and its may be really far from reality
i have removed removed somebody's personal opinion from the article.Bharatveer 03:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I have added the benefits (quoted from Supreme Court Judgement) and have removed the POv check tag.Bharatveer 05:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
This article needs to be re-written in better English. It's terribly written as is, to the point that comprehension is difficult.
POV?
[edit]Some edits have taken place to this already-challenged article. A couple of IPs have engaged in wholesale removal of content, to the point where the article was nothing but a list of benefits. That cannot be. I have restored most of that content and have made some stylistic edits. The article needs more sources, no doubt, but it also needs editors who are willing to choose objectivity over some particular point of view. Drmies (talk) 05:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Dam Site by Navarun.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Dam Site by Navarun.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC) |
Tag
[edit]I just tagged the article for better references, because the entire section on the benefits of the dam is based on the supreme court judgement, which is hardly appropriate. The impact assessment in 1990 would be a far better source. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
don't mention the USA all the time in Wikipedia
[edit]"is the second largest concrete gravity dam (by volume) after Grand Coulee Dam in the US"... who cares! The US is just an overrated country. This article is about INDIA not about the US. 93.219.174.91 (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- If the largest concrete dam by volume was in New Zealand, we'd mention it too. When any structure is second to another, it's always worth it to list the first or link to a list of the largest. Often a reader wonders, "Well, what is the largest then?"--NortyNort (Holla) 22:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sardar Sarovar Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100512052556/http://aidindia.org/main/content/view/1226/457/ to http://aidindia.org/main/content/view/1226/457/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071222120804/http://www.math.tifr.res.in/~vvaish/shared/index.php?Adir= to http://www.math.tifr.res.in/~vvaish/shared/index.php?Adir=&Afile=SSA-WB-Review.djvu
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071222120804/http://www.math.tifr.res.in/~vvaish/shared/index.php?Adir= to http://www.math.tifr.res.in/~vvaish/shared/index.php?Adir=&Afile=SSA-WB-Review.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)