Talk:Saraqib
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saraqib. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130206084343/http://www.cbssyr.org/new%20web%20site/General_census/census_2004/NH/TAB07-4-2004.htm to http://www.cbssyr.org/new%20web%20site/General_census/census_2004/NH/TAB07-4-2004.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2020
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
5.120.59.141 (talk) 08:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
but on 27th februry 2020 heyat tahrir al sham recapture the town once again.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- It seems the article is wrong. Here is the proof: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/27/syrian-rebels-retake-key-town-idlib-from-assad-forces-saraqeb
Hence, "On 27 February, 2020, Syrian opposition retook Saraqeb" must be added to the article.Battletanks (talk) 07:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)