Talk:Sandy Newman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sandy Newman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 14 April 2013 by reviewer Mblumber (talk · contribs).

Edit requested: delete from last sentence in first paragraph "serves on the board of Council for a Strong America.

Reason:I (Sandy Newman) am no longer on the board of Council for a Strong America. To confirm this, you can contact me at Sandynewman@gmail.com, or contact the President of the Council for a Strong America, dkass@councilforastrongamerica.org 96.241.52.83 (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 96.241.52.83 (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Current Affairs and the Need for Neutrality, Comprehensiveness and No Censorship!

Be informed that the policies WP:PROMOTION i.e. advocacy of any sort must be avoided and neutral point of view WP:NPOV must be upheld. It is especially important when current affairs and politics are discussed that on should be careful of WP:NOTCENSORED and have a more WP:COMPREHENSIVE view. From a European, maybe a more depassionate view, it is very disheartening to see that advocacy and censorship is taking a firmer grip on editors from Northern America and intertwined current affairs. Anyone with strong views on the 2016 US presidential elections for or against one candidate and is from Northern America, should think ten times over before removing or censoring well documented and relevant material. Wikipedia is not a Democracy WP:NOT#DEM, so no misuse of the WP:CONSENSUS by hitting with the "Consensus Shtick". Wikipedia is not political war zone, it is inclusive. IBestEditor (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does this comment have anything to do with the content of this article? Safehaven86 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with undue weight. I agree that there should wp:notcensored and that it must be wp:comprehensive. The article about Sandy Newman is in it's beginning/infancy and anything you add that isn't basic bio, can be claimed to be "undue weight". With that premise nothing will be added if it has to fit some construed sequence & order - that just seems to be a cover for wp:promotion by the use of wp:cherrypicking. So please, hold your horses and respect wp:notcensored. PS If you want to make the sentence leaner, add something, change, don't just bulldoze it in the name of wp:promotion Mauri Kunnas (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]