Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021 is part of the San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
August 31, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

European Microstates: San Marino Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject San Marino (assessed as Low-importance).

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 17:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

Use "plainlist" instead of "<br>".
Add a hyphen between "second best".
Add alt text to every image.
Also add "upright" to the images.
The word "Latin" is often capitalized.
The Kebero article has the word in italics.
"in order to" → "to" (less wordy)
"for previous year" → "for the previous year"
"perfomers" - typo?
Sources are archived.

@Some Dude From North Carolina: The above items have been addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 19:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·