Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017 is part of the San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 15, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
May 4, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

European Microstates: San Marino Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject San Marino (assessed as Low-importance).

Eurovision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 12:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this soon; hopefully you will succeed in promoting this GT ultimately! --K. Peake 12:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Wikilink Ralph Siegel in the infobox
Swap the order of the other two songwriters per the body
"and the completion of a tour that included a stops in" → "and promotional performances in" per the body
"San Marino performed tenth" → "San Marino performed 10th" per MOS:NUM
Shouldn't the Eurovision Song Contest final sub-section be retitled to grand final like most have been and then you fix the pipe accordingly?

Done except the last one. There is a bit of a disagreement about how we want to refer to it. I'll update it to whatever term is decided when that happens. Grk1011 (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grk1011 It is best not to update it until the discussion is resolved, to avoid stability issues. --K. Peake 15:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background

You should add a comma after "next two entries" and one after 2016 for correct separation
"San Marino was included on the European Broadcasting Union's (EBU) list" → "the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) included San Marino on their list"

Done

Before Eurovision

Internal selection

Pipe SMRTV to San Marino RTV on the img text
"On 7 March 2017, SMRTV Director General" → "On 7 March 2017, Radiotelevisione della Repubblica di San Marino (SMRTV) director general" with the pipe
Unless I missed something in the wording, the studios part is not sourced
Pipe 2012, 2013 and 2014 to their respective Eurovision articles
"2012 through 2015." → "2012 through to 2015."
The first sentence of SMRTV's response does not appear to be properly sourced
"to represent that nation;" → "to represent the nation;"

Done

Promotion

"were filmed by" → "was filmed by"
"on 24 March" → "on 24 March 2017"
"where they performed" → "where they performed the song"
"On 8 April, they performed during the ninth edition" → "On 8 April 2017, the two performed during the ninth annual edition"
Remove wikilink on Spain

Done

At Eurovision

"at International Exhibition Centre" → "at the International Exhibition Centre"
Remember my earlier comment about the grand final pipe, if it is fully relevant
Even though the countries not needing to qualify is sourced, that being part of the Eurovision Rules is not
"The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) split up" → "The EBU split up"
The favourable voting histories part is not sourced
Pipe second semi final to Eurovision Song Contest 2017#Semi-final 2
"on 13 April" → "on 13 April 2017"
The Radio San Marino broadcast is not sourced

Done

Semi-final

Img looks good!
"in dress rehearsals on" → "in respective dress rehearsals on"
"on 10 May," → "on 10 May 2017,"
Monetta's outfit is sourced as black and white, but Wilson's is only sourced as black so reword accordingly
The chandelier is unsourced
Last para looks good!

Done

Voting

Whole sub-section looks good apart from Fabrizio Raggi appearing not to be sourced as a chairperson, unless that's what Juror A indicates?

Done

References

Copyvio score looks quite good at 20.6%
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
Cite Quotidiano.net as publisher instead for ref 14
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 15 and 31 plus add SMRTV in brackets for both and wikilink San Marino RTV on the first ref
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 25

Done

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; neat article like your previous ones, though! --K. Peake 17:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I addressed all the issues you noted. Let me know if I missed anything! Grk1011 (talk) 23:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grk1011 ✓ Pass now, you have implemented everything as far as I can see apart from the grand final point, but you have a valid reason not to! --K. Peake 07:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]