Jump to content

Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The odd redundant word etc. I performed a copyedit, and it should be fine now. My only concern is that the WP:LEAD is very short. Even if the article is sparse, do not hesitate to make a decent lead. In particular, there is nothing on the selection and after the contest-sections. The lead should be at least twice, perhaps three times, the length.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Ref 32 is published on day 0? Is date lacking, or is it a typo?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: On hold; longer lead = good article. Arsenikk (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sims and I addressed the concerns. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Looks great. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]