Talk:San Giorgio-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

With a few grammatical tweaks having been made, the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, structure, and general layout. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article has a healthy list of reliable sources in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and doesn't seem to contain any original research. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

It looks as though the article covers all necessary aspects of its topic; its coverage is thorough and relevant. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article does not exhibit any bias concerning its subject. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since the article's creation, it does not seem to have undergone any edit warring or disruptive editing. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The several images used are all public domain, and relevantly illustrate the article. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Ping--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I do need to get going with this one. I'll get on to that right now. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After checking this article against the criteria, I am satisfied it qualifies for GA-status. Congratulations! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]