Talk:Samurai Harem: Asu no Yoichi

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title change

the title of this should be ASU NO YOICHI instead of ASHITA, if you look at the japanese wiki page for this manga.

Article has been moved to Asu no Yoichi! since then. Extremepro (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

remove the ! in the hyperlink, it causes problems on forums when linking what do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.160.240 (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not our problem. The exclamation point is part of the title, therefore the article name uses it. If some certain forum software doesn't happen to be robust enough to properly escape it and other special characters, it's a problem with the forum software and should not be corrected by moving an article away from its proper title here. That being said, I went ahead and created the redirect Asu no Yoichi as a probable search term. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 21:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

There's a merge tag on the talk page but not on the article. And which article(s) should this article be merged to? Extremepro (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No idea, merge may have already been done.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Characters

Some of the characters have their voice actors picked for them already but I cannot remember what their character are like so I cannot describe them, since I haven't read the manga for a while. Help would be greatly appreciated. Extremepro (talk) 00:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anime isn't being released until August 2009, so no need to have possible voice actors at all. Nor should they be put at the front, as its primary work is the manga, not the non-existant anime. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Extremepro (talk) 03:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Resolved

Would like an image of Asu no Yoichi! manga cover for the infobox. Extremepro (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Names

Is there a rule to writing them? I know that the order for the name is "Family-given" for Japanese and that kanji is preferred for the surname. But does the rule apply for the given name? and can the given name be written in hirigana / katakana? Extremepro (talk) 05:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:MOS-AM, you should always write the English names in Western order, and in Japanese order for the kanji and romaji versions. Hope that helps. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure does. Thanks Extremepro (talk) 03:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angela vs Angura

On most translations of the manga, it's Angela. Extremepro (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you just translate her name in Romaji, its Anjura. But it is a european name and it would be Angela. Its pretty hard to decide, I guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishikawa Gensui (talk • contribs) 01:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the series is not licensed, the straight romaji should be used: Anjura, not what scanslators are using. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you are right. Anyway I will add her character profile now, using the romaji then. --Ishikawa Gensui (talk) 01:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming no one actually reads the raw japanese versions. Its not licensed, but there IS an actual romanization from the mangaka. That's not just a generally accepted fan romanization. The writer himself has it romanized as "Angela". Unless you want to argue the mangaka's wrong about his own manga, that's about as official as it gets at this point. 76.105.46.150 (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

References might be needed for the manga release dates. However, most of the sites, like http://www.akitashoten.co.jp/index2.html (Akita Shoten homepage), are in Japanese and my Japanese is elementary. Help please? Extremepro (talk) 10:18, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After I sleep a bit (just drove 4 hours), I'll add in the refs. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Extremepro (talk) 22:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And done. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Asu no Yoichi! episodes

Should there a link under "Anime" linking to "List of Asu no Yoichi! episodes" for the episode list?Extremepro (talk) 00:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, as the article doesn't exist. And until the series is longer, one isn't needed. At least not until maybe 13 episodes and then only if they have summaries. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

taking a look

I was asked to look at this article, and so I have looked. I might not tell you much more than you already know, but here goes. The first thing that strikes me is that there is very little context for the character listing - there is no plot section. I don't know why this has a "too much plot" tag, but I suspect it is due to the slimness of the reception section when compared to the character list. The volume list needs individual summaries, the reception section needs expanding. The character list needs copyediting (esp. in regards to American/"British" spellings, but also in the general 'I've never seen this before, and I am really really confused' sense...) - also, if you could find creator commentary, it would be great if you could add some to this section. I gather there is a movement away from having character sections in articles, so having some out of universe information here could be a good idea if you wish to keep a discrete character section. Stuff on the anime needs its tense checked (the anime's finished airing, so it should be in past-tense). I question the "May 2009" information about the manga, as the citation seems to be from 2008... After this, I would suggest checking around in the relevant places to see if there's any new information that could be incorporated. Has it been licensed in English or any other languages? The very last thing that should be done is expanding the lead, making sure it meets WP:LEAD. It's often easiest to do this last, as by the time you do so, you understand the rest of it enough to summarise it efficiently. You may wish to consult the fiction Manual of Style for further advice. I've marked up the text with some {{clarifyme}} templates to mark where I had the most difficulty understanding the article, as I've never seen the show. --Malkinann (talk) 12:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should I make a section that compares the differences between the anime and the manga? Extremepro (talk) 03:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so - that kind of a section tends to be a original research attractant. --Malkinann (talk) 03:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Mania.com: DVD Complete collection Mania.com --KrebMarkt 18:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Manga v1[reply]
ANN: ANN DVD Complete set --KrebMarkt 19:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Manga v1, Manga v2[reply]
THEM Anime: [1]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Samurai Harem: Asu no Yoichi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091129070148/http://lantis-net.com:80/yoichi/ to http://lantis-net.com/yoichi/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]