Talk:Samuel H. Smith (Latter Day Saints)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samuel H. Smith (Latter Day Saints) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latter Day Saint movement Mid‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poisoning

Does anyone really take this idea seriously? Perhaps it was never "proven nor disproven", but since when to crackpot theories need to be proven? Thmazing (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really how any individuals personally feel about it—whether they believe it to be true or not—but the accusation by William Smith is notable enough to be mentioned in most modern accounts of his life and death. Apart from sources published by the LDS Church or its leaders, I've never seen a biographical source that doesn't mention it. (It's understandable why the LDS Church sources wouldn't mention it, since the crackpot-ism is targeted at accusing some people who became prominent members in that church.) It was one of the major reasons William Smith was so much against the LDS Church for the rest of his life. Some say he already hated Brigham Young and this was just another "reason" he gave for it. In any case, I think it's brought up enough to be mentioned in the article. However, I would have no objection to changing the sentence to simply state that "the theory was never proven", since I agree with your statement on the general non-necessity of proving conspiracy theories wrong. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the change I made? Thmazing (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably OK, in my opinion. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article

I've moved the article back to "Samuel H. Smith (Latter Day Saints)" because from a rough google search "Samuel H. Smith" appears to be more commonly used for this person than the full name "Samuel Harrison Smith". For example, a search for "Samuel H. Smith" and Mormon yields more hits than a search for "Samuel H. Smith". I checked the text of History of the Church for historical usages, and from what I can see it uniformly refers to him as "Samuel H. Smith", as do references in the Doctrine and Covenants as well as modern LDS Church manuals and periodicals. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 05:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Samuel H. Smith (Latter Day Saints). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151021235534/https://www.lds.org/manual/church-history-in-the-fulness-of-times-student-manual/chapter-six-organization-of-the-church-of-jesus-christ to http://www.lds.org/manual/church-history-in-the-fulness-of-times-student-manual/chapter-six-organization-of-the-church-of-jesus-christ

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]