This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
I'm not sure the claim that SSM is legal in the state is valid. No legislation was passed but instead we this report on conjur.com.br on a court decision that talk about the legilatization of "união" and "casamento" in a quite mixed and vague manner and mentions how unclear the situation is for notaries, among others (at least that's what my Google translation reveals). Here we have a court decision that does not seem to be the final point, because as the source conjur.com.br states, the Supreme Court has been vague on the issue. Take to that the total absence of international coverage, normally a given when it comes to SSM, and the lack of detail on the ruling and its consequences in the website article and I'm not convinced we can claim SSM is legally available for all. Perhaps someone who speaks both Portugese and English well could help with the issue. Hekerui (talk) 19:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
