Talk:Samaire Armstrong

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Dirty Sexy Money future appearances

I removed "She did not make any future appearances after its first season" in regards to her work on Dirty Sexy Money as she did appear as a guest star in the second season in at least one episode (episode 10, "The Facts").

Someone added

This: "Her father is American and her Mother is of Japanese decent." Is this correct? I don't think she is actually of Japanese descent, but I could be wrong. Mad Jack O'Lantern 19:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She looks it. I mean the Japanese name, the fact that she lived in Hawaii before Arizona. She looks half Japanese, especially when she has the dark hair.User: Aoecean

Lol, well we can't go by looks. :) Mad Jack O'Lantern 21:41, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, I just wish we could get confirmation on this...Its driving me nuts!

User: Aoecean

It will probably come out sooner or later. These kinda things usually do. :) Mad Jack O'Lantern 06:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I hope. Because she's the strangest looking eyes I've ever seen on a white girl. She actually looks like this girl I know who is half Japanese, and has the same eyes. User: Aoecean

She's born in Japan for sure, but I do not know about her parents. _└ ^VodkaJazz / _talk ^┐ 23:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You gots your answer. Half Scottish and half Italian. Mad Jack 08:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then why is she listed "American"? 76.20.210.160 (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

japanese

do you recon we can consider her japanese? the japanese are very strict with who isnt considered japanese. even if a korean is born in japan, he is not considered japanese. some are 3rd generation.

external links

I'm pretty sure that's not Armstrong's official site but just a site of a celebrity ring. _└ ^VodkaJazz / _talk ^┐ 21:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it is worth mentioning but she appears on a show called "Living with Fran" Horkana

Non-recurring appearances are not usually mentioned. _└ ^VodkaJazz / _talk ^┐ 10:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gaelic name?

Who decided that? If it were it would be spelt 'Samhaire'. As for the IPA in brackets, that it not correct either.

159.134.220.86 14:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Jack[reply]

Picture

I just uploaded the picture Samaire_Armstrong_in_its_a_boy_girl_thing.png, if i broke any rules just delete it, it is my first picture uploaded to wikipedia, i think i followed all rules and laws but if not let me know - Gunnaraztek 23:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images

I have again deleted the links to the images which were previously deleted. Restoring links to non-existant images serves no purpose. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Samaire Armstrong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Racism category

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Involved close for reason: dispute moved to Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#RfC_notices. Mgp28 (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this page be included in Category:Anti-black racism in the United States? (Contributors to this RfC may also wish to take part in Talk:Louis Farrakhan#RfC: Bias categories and Talk:Malik Zulu Shabazz#RfC: Racism categories.) gnu 57 01:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No per WP:CATBLP: Do not categorize biographies of living people under such contentious topics as racism, sexism, extremism, and the like, since these have the effect of labeling a person as a racist, sexist, or extremist. gnu 57 01:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Repeating my comment from Talk:Malik Zulu Shabazz: No. WP:BLPRACIST seems clear on this. Is there a reason we should be considering going against the policy on these three articles? —Mgp28 (talk) 09:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously no. I have no idea why we have an RfC on this - it would be a blatant BLP violation. St Anselm (talk) 14:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Genericusername57: Starting an RfC on a single article talk page is not an appropriate way to go about getting a consensus for making mass category changes which have been disputed. Instead, please start an RfC on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Community consensus has already made it clear that this sort of categorisation is inappropriate. We don't need another RfC. St Anselm (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you mass revert back after BLPCAT was raised given WP:BLPUNDEL? In this specific article, there was no mention of racism or racist or even accusations of such in the article text. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you AGF. I was unaware of the thing you mention, and it was not brought to my attention by anyone. I was operating on the basis of my watchlist and the apparent lack of a consensus for mass deletions. If there is a consensus for mass deletions, please point me to the specific place where that consensus was reached. Otherwise, the mass removals are entirely out of process. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Policy, specifically WP:BLPRACIST, reflects the consensus of the community.[1] Mass reinstatement of good faith disputed BLP issues is not policy per WP:BLPUNDEL. So where was the assumption of good faith on GNU's edits? Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is your objection to the process by which these categories were removed, or do you think that these articles should remain in the categories?

At the moment there seems to be agreement that WP:BLPCAT reflects consensus that no articles about living people should be in those categories. If that's the case, I don't think I understand what is additionally needed to show consensus that articles about living people should be removed from those categories. Mgp28 (talk) 11:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, given my comments in the thread directly above. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, per CATBLP. Note: this RFC also concerns 81 other articles, in these 62 and these 19 contributions. Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Summoned by bot) No, and why does this even need an RfC? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background at BLPN[2], @Rhododendrites: Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, logically. Ortizesp (talk) 08:47, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.