Jump to content

Talk:Sam Strachan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSam Strachan has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sam Strachan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello! I'm Weebiloobil (talk · contribs), and I will be GA-reviewing this article. Having enjoyed Holby City yesterday, I feel in a Holby mood. Feel free to leave comments on my talk page if you wish, or just leave them here. For reference, here is the Good Article criteria. Good luck! - weebiloobil (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with my computer have caused this review to take longer than expected; howerever, it should be completed by tomorrow. Oh, I can't wait! - weebiloobil (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Review

[edit]

Usually at this point, I would be exmploying one of the useful checklist templates to see how this article compares to the Good Article criteria (GAC). However, in this case, I don't think it's needed; this article has no apparant flaws compared to the GAC whatsoever. Congratulations, you have a good article! - weebiloobil (talk) 16:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review! :) Frickative 00:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Reaction to his casting. — M.Mario (T/C) 19:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sam Strachan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sam Strachan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]