Talk:Salt N' Pepper

Salt N' Pepper was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 14, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Kerala / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Salt N' Pepper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bollyjeff (talk · contribs) 16:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to review this article. BollyJeff || talk 16:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to quick-fail this for the following reasons:

Some unreliable sources - ex: Indiaglitz, blogs, etc
Some misleading names in references - ex: 5 citations from moviebuzz.org ( a blog) claimed to be official website
Some major claims are unsourced - ex: "Salt N Pepper successfully completed in all major centers,and considered as one of the biggest hit of the year."
Some missing content normal for film articles - ex: no box office numbers
Some diasambig links were present
Use of table for cast list against MOS
The major contibutor is banned user
The nominator has made only 1 edit to article

In short, it is not up to par with GA status or other film GAs. It needs major work, and judging by the list of contributors, that is not likely to happen soon. If someone is willing to put in the work, it can be renominated at some point in the further, but right now it is not close to GA. BollyJeff || talk 17:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:
Pass/Fail: